|
Thursday, March 31, 2005
Once again, since we didn't have Sunday School on Easter Sunday, we'll be posting various quotes from stuff I'm reading and giving you a chance to respond. Today's quote comes from a recent Christianity Today magazine article.
The article, by Andy Crouch, is titled "Compliant but Confused" and details the book "Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers." It even says that "No book in recent memory has as much potential to transform the practice of youth ministry..." Needless to say, I was intrigued.
The article highlights some of the findings, such as "there is no generation gap" (meaning that teens these days generally like and admire their parents), "teens like church" (meaning that teens would like to attend more services than they already do, they're just so busy) and "teens are not spiritual seekers" (meaning that 75% of teens identify with some form of Christianity, less than 1% are involved in exploring alternative religions like Wicca).
Then the fodder for today's quote:
"If only all the news were so encouraging. In fact, these quantitative indicators are overshadowed by what [authors] Smith and Denton found out when they sat down to talk with teens one-on-one. It should rock the world of every church in the country: In spite of their generally positive attitude toward religion, almost no teenagers from any religious background, can articulate the most basic beliefs of their faith...They could talk sophisticatedly about Will & Grace but not grace."
So, teenagers (and adults who I know secretly read this but don't tell...you aren't exempt, either), two questions: Do you agree or disagree and why? And secondly, if it's true, what are we going to do about it?
Brent 4:39 AM
Wednesday, March 30, 2005
Due to the reality there was no Sunday School class on Easter Sunday, we'll be finding provocative quotes and letting you guys respond to them. Since you guys have been a bit slow in leaving comments lately, I thought I would liven things up a bit with a quote on the nature of worship. It comes from Dave Crowder (yes, THAT Dave Crowder) in his new book, “Praise Habit.”
“Think back. Try hard to recall what praise in its undiluted purity felt like. When you would dance with your arms fully extended rather than elbows bent, folded closely to your person in such a guarded fashion. Remember how effortlessly we sang the praises of things we enjoyed? It was so easy and natural. What if this kind of praise freely leaked from us in delightful response to God? What if life were like that all the time? What if we were so moved by who God is, what He’s done, what He will do, that praise, adoration, worship, whatever, continuously careened in our heads and pounded in our souls? What if praise were on the tip of our tongues like we were a loaded weapon in the hands of a trigger-happy meth addict and every moment just set us off? This is what we will do for eternity. What makes us think our time on earth should be any different? What keeps it from being so?”
That should stir you up a bit…so comment away!
Brent 4:32 AM
Tuesday, March 29, 2005
Due to the reality there was no Sunday School class on Easter Sunday, we'll be finding provocative quotes and letting you guys respond to them. Today's is from a Texas pastor named Gordon Atkinson, talking about some problems he's having regarding church. Funny thing, these were on HIS blog!
"I believed then and still believe that many Christians are not honest about their own failings, sins and disappointments. Like Martha Stewart, they try to sell a sugary, imaginary world of happiness to people who are hurting and looking for real answers."
Do you agree or disagree? Why? If you agree, what can & should be done about it? If you disagree, why do you think the author says it?
"I believed then and still believe that many Christians have created a subculture with it's own language, customs and myths. Ministers even have their own dialects and hairdos. Weird. This subculture is really more about worshipping America than God, more about achieving than receiving, more about competition than grace. The problem with a religious subculture is no one else 'get's it' and you are isolated from the world you are called to SERVE."
Again, do you agree or disagree? Why?
Brent 4:14 AM
Monday, March 28, 2005
Hope all of you had a meaningful Holy Week study and a joyful Easter celebration!
As is our custom on weeks we don't have Sunday School, we'll use this blog for provocative quotes I find in my reading, so feel free to comment away on the various subjects!
Today's quote is from Eugene Peterson (in a recent issue of "Christianity Today"):
"This promise of intimacy is both right and wrong. There is an intimacy with God, but it's like any other intimacy; it's part of the fabric of your life. In marriage you don't feel intimate most of the time. Nor with a friend. Intimacy isn't primarily a mystical emotion. It's a way of life, a life of openness, honesty, a certain transparency...
...If you read the saints, they're pretty ordinary people. There are moments of rapture and ecstasy, but once every 10 years. And even then it's a surprise to them. They didn't do anything. We've got to disabuse people of these illusionsof what the Christian life is. It's a wonderful life, but it's not wonderful in the way a lot of people want it to be."
The question today is this: Do we have expectations of the spiritual life that are unrealistic? If so, what do these expecations cause if they're unmet? What is a realistic expectation of intimacy with God?
Brent 5:37 AM
Sunday, March 27, 2005
"But on the first day of the week, at early dawn, they came to the tomb, bringing the spices which they had prepared. And they found the stone rolled away from the tomb but they did not find the body of the Lord Jesus. And it happened that while they were perplexed about this, behold, two men suddenly stood near them in dazzling apparel; and as the women were terrified and bowed their faces to the ground, the men said to them, 'Why do you seek the living One among the dead?...
He
is
not
here,
but
He
has
risen..."
Amen.
Happy Easter, everybody.
Brent 3:00 AM
Saturday, March 26, 2005
I went to see the movie "The Passion of the Christ" at the first showing, the day it opened. I wen that early partly for work-related things (I knew parents would want to know if it was a good movie to take their children to) and partly because I have a significant interest in how movies and television compare to the Bible accounts. I was particularly interested in how "The Passion" stacked up because it had gotten so much hype.
And that kind of falls in line with our study on Holy Week we've been doing. We've been trying to piece together the events of the Easter story into a semblance of timeline we can understand, and the same can be true of the events from the trials to the end of the Crucifixion...which is where we left off in the accounts, the trials of Christ and the denials by Peter. Pilate had just released Barabbas at the behest of the crowd after "washing his hands" of the decision (...right...)
First, the mockery in the Praetorium. This account is found in Matthew 27: 27--29, and Mark 15: 16--20.
There are soldiers there, stripped Him, put a crown of thorns on Him and mocked Him. After that, they led Him to the "formal" crucifixion in His own clothes. These thorns were long and went deep into His head, which I'm sure would cause significant blood loss.
In Matthew 27: 32, Mark 15: 21, Luke 23:26 and John 19:17 tell of Jesus having to carry His cross to the site of crucifixion. And, in fact, this scene is done very well in "The Passion." The streets would be crowded during the Passover time of year and this "parade" would be very humiliating...not to mention that Christ would be very tired and drained from the events of the last few hours. Simon, the Cyrene would now be called on to carry His cross for Him. And this scene was well done in the Passion as well...director Mel Gibson had Simon argue initially, which I think would've been a natural reaction since Simon wouldn't want to be associated with public humiliation or mistaken identity that he was guilty of something!
Luke 23: 27--31 shows us a discussion that took place between Jesus and some women who were weeping for Him. Interestingly enough, Jesus informed them not to weep for Him, but the people that needed pity would be those who suffered the consequences of rejection of Him as Messiah.
Matthew 27:33, Mark 15: 22--25, Luke 23:32--33; John 19: 17--18, show us that two others were crucified alongside Jesus at Golgotha at approximately 9AM on good Friday.
In fact, I used to go into a detailed description when I taught on the crucifixion and wathing "The Passion" changed my view on that. As I watched it visually portrayed in the movie, it dawned on me that I had been watching Christ be brutally beaten and tortured for about two hours...and it exhausted me emotionally...which I imagine would be the effect the director wanted, but I found it more spiritually beneficial to me to focus on the work instead of the brutality. I've come to the conclusion, at this point in my ministry, what you really need to know is that Roman soldiers were trained killers, making this a brutal event. And if you simply take the Biblical accounts and imagine what it would feel like to have those things happen to your body, you can get a rough idea of the horror that crucifixion was.
In Luke 23:34 we see Christ as God to forgive those who were a part of the event. Wow.
Matthew 27: 37, Mark 15: 26 and John 19:19-22 all show us what was going on back in the government seats with Pilate and the sign he put over Christ's cross, which read that Jesus was King of the Jews. It was meant mockingly, but taken literally.
In Mark 15: 24 & John 19: 23-24, we see the soldiers gambling for Jesus clothes. I've thought that if this were done in today's society, the "winners" of the clothes would probably sell them on Ebay...
Now, it's about noon. The cross is set in place and Jesus is simply hanging there.
In Matthew 27: 39--40, Mark 15: 29-30, Luke 23: 35, John 19: 24, all show the crowd mocking Him, wanting Him to get off the cross and prove He is who He said He was. The religious leaders as well as the Romans were invovled in this.
Could Jesus have done what the crowd challenged Him to do? Of course...but He was aware of what His mission was, and He put serving us ahead of "proof."
Then Matthew 27:44 & Luke 23: 39-44 we get the accounts of one of the theives being saved on his cross.
In John 19: 25--27, Jesus shows love for His mother.
In Matthew 27: 47--49, Mark 15:35-36 and John 19: 28-29, we see Jesus being misunderstood on the cross. He asked God why He had forsaken Him...and the crowd thought He was calling for Elijah (the Hebrew phrase for asking God started with Eli Eli, which is why the crowd could make this mistake). He now took a drink.
And finally, in Matthew 27:50; Luke 23: 46 and John 19:30, Jesus cries out in a loud voice,
"It
is
finished."
And then He gave up His spirit...He was in control of events, even the crucifixion and time of death...at roughly 3PM or so.
It was finished.
It is finished.
And it demands a response from all of history. It's more than a movie.
What's yours?
Brent 7:19 AM
Friday, March 25, 2005
As we continue our look at the events of Holy Week and piece together the Easter story timeline, we need to take a break in the story. See, yesterday we looked at the trials and in order to maintain some continuity we left out a crucial part in the story. If this were a movie, this would be called a flashback.
So, get comfy, get your Bible and read through Luke 22: 54--62. Ask the "5 w's and an 'h'" questions.
WHAT time was it? WHERE were they? WHO was involved?
Well, from this section, we learn that it was AFTER the arrest of Christ, which we learned earlier this week must've taken place before 2AM or so. We also learn that Christ is in the home of the high priest, so it's during the trial phase we studied in depth yesterday. Peter's in the story, two young women and a man are involved. As is a rooster. As is Jesus, too.
In verse 55, we learn that there is a fire in the courtyard and a servant girl noticed Peter and commented that he was with Jesus.
Peter says he doesn't know Jesus in verse 57.
In verse 58 Peter is identified again. Peter denies it again in 58 as well.
An hour or so later, Peter is identified again. When he says he doesn't know what the man is talking about (the third denial) he hears a rooster crow.
Verse 61 is haunting: "And the Lord turned and looked at Peter..." Peter was within eyesight of Christ during the trial--and if you believe that "before the cock crows" was a Roman term for the end of the third watch at 3AM--then you can know that Jesus was in Caiaphas' house enduring all sorts of violations of His rights during a sham trial and Peter makes eye contact. Can you imagine? The crow of the rooster still ringing in Peter's ears; the eye contact with His Lord; the echoes of Christ's words, "Before a cock crows today, you will deny me three times."
It makes me think verse 62 is a classic understatment: "And Peter went out and wept bitterly."
What light do the correlating verses throw in there? Matthew 26: 58 verifies that Peter was there during the first trial. Verses 69--75 also give us some insights. Peter was identified with the Galilean (likely due to their dialects). We also learn that the crowd heard the accusations. We're tuned into the vehemence with which Peter makes the denials...and the verification of Peter's weeping.
If we look at John 18: 15--19, we learn that Peter was actually was able to get inside the door of the home of the high priest. In the courtyard, we learn a crucial detail that comes up later in John (the type of fire in the court is referred to as a "charcoal fire"...which, in the later scene on the beach after the Resurrection when Jesus forgives Peter 3 times, He built a charcoal fire, when one of sticks or drift would be more common on a beach)...we learn that it was a chilly night. We also learn that Peter was the one who cut off the arresting person's ear (no mention is made of the healing, right? Interesting...) in vv. 25-27.
Mark 14:66--72 is also consistent in it's account, but doesn't really give us much new information...maybe a bit about a porch and Peter cursed and swore, too.
But what gets me about the story is how much I identify with Peter. One minute I can be telling Christ how much I'm willing to die for Him, and then a short while later, I'm literally betraying Him in some form or fashion. I often wonder what it will be like to look into the eyes of Christ, and I wonder what it would be like to look into them right after a denial of some type...
Weeping bitterly might be an understatement. Say what you want about Peter during this point in his life, but at least he was remorseful, and understood the gravity of what he did to Him. Soemtimes I don't think I do.
What does this story bring up in you today, this Good Friday?
Brent 3:35 AM
Thursday, March 24, 2005
Most of you know by now that we're in a section of Bible study where we're trying to put together the events of Easter week into some semblance of a timeline. Yesterday we discussed the arrest of Jesus, and to me, this next section is where I get most confused. The various "trials" of Christ. In other words, what happens after they arrest Him?
Don't forget: Get comfy, get out your Bible, and pray for God's leading & guidance as you study His very words to us...
The first place to start would be the events of Friday morning right after the arrest, which can be found in John 18: 12--14, and then in 19--24. Don't forget to answer the questions first, and THEN move along in the reading.
WHAT happens to Jesus in v. 12? WHO takes this action? WHERE do they take Him in v. 13? WHO is this, and WHAT is their relationship? WHAT answer does Jesus give in v. 21? WHO gets involved and WHAT do they do in vv. 22? WHAT is Jesus response? WHERE do they take Jesus next in v. 24?
Obviously, the Roman cohort, their commander, and the Jewish leaders arrest Jesus and they take Him to Annas. Annas was the father-in-law of the high priest Caiaphas. In fact, if you want a bit of history on Caiaphas, you could turn to John 11: 45--50, and we see him putting an end to a discussion the Pharisees were having about Jesus and His works. Caiaphas said it would be more expedient to kill one man for the good of the Jewish nation than for the whole nation to die because of Him. In fact, that very day, they plotted to find a way to kill Jesus.
Now, skip down to verse 19 (we'll cover the other verses tomorrow) and we see that the "trial" is pretty much a scam. The questioning begins and Jesus actually asserts His rights. He makes a plea that He doesn't understand precisely why this is being done in secret. He also informs the high priest that He is aware that He doesn't have to testify against Himself, and wants the priest to get witnesses and follow procedure. The officers strike Jesus, who remains in control of the events. He says again to follow procedure if He's spoken wrongly, but if not, you have no right to strike Me. They take Him to Caiaphas.
The correlations are found in Matthew 26: 57--68. We learn that they were trying to get false witnesses, and failed. Finally, in verses 61 and 62 they find something they can try Him on. But Caiaphus can't get Jesus to testify against Himself and finally, in verse 63, invokes a little-used courtroom rule that can force someone to testify against Himself and Christ responds in verse 64. This gives Caiaphas all the evidence he needed to give Christ a death sentence and he does so (never mind that in Jewish law there was supposed to be a 24-hour period between conviction and sentencing), and proceed to beat and slap Jesus while mocking Him.
There are more correlations in Mark 14: 53--65, but the accounts are strikingly similar.
In John 18: 28--40, the civil trials begin (Christ was convicted in a religious trial and sentenced to death...but they have no ability to execute, so they have to get the Roman government to do so). They take Christ to Pilate (carefully avoiding being ceremonially unclean by going into the Praetorium, yet oblivious that they are going to ceremonially unclean by murdering Jesus), and they accuse Christ of being an evildoer. Pilate wants the Jews to handle their own problem, but undertakes the case under pressure at approximately 6AM Friday morning. After listening to Him for a bit, we learn in Luke 23: 7 that Pilate discovers that Jesus is from Galilee and gladly sends Jesus to Herod as it's now in his jurisdiction.
Jesus and Herod have a past. See...Herod was responsible for the beheading of Jesus' cousin and forerunner John the Baptist. So, when He arrives before Herod, who questioned Him at length, and Jesus was silent before Herod. Completely. Nothing at all to say to this man. Herod, again under crowd pressure, mocks and beats Christ and sends Him back to Pilate.
In Luke 23: 13--25, Pilate calls a meeting. The chief priests and rulers are together and Pilate informs them that thus far, Christ is not guilty of anything, but in order to keep the peace, He'll be punished and released. The Jews would have none of that. A more detailed account is in John 18:33ff...Pilate questions Christ extensively and in v. 38 we see that Pilate is unconvinced of any guilt on Christ's part. He decides to let the public decide by allowing the people to choose the release of one person (as is the Passover custom). Their choices are between Jesus and a robber/insurrectionist named Barabbas.
As punishment, Jesus is scourged (whipped) by soldiers and has a crown of thorns put on His head and a purple robe (mockingly given by Herod) and they mock Him. Pilate brings Christ before the crowd and tells them he has found no guilt in Him. The crowd wants crucifixion as the punishment. Pilate again tries to get Jesus to give him a reason to let Him go, and Christ doesn't really do it. Pilate succombs to crowd pressure, and around noon the crucifixion begins in earnest.
Tomorrow, we'll pick up some pieces we left out, namely Peter's denials, but by way of application, what do these events stir up in your mind as to how to apply some things you learn? For me, it's the idea that Christ was in control of these events. At any point, He could've brought them to a screeching halt and He chose not to...for me. What it stirs up in me is thankfulness. That He knew He was facing a brutal and humiliating death, and this whole series of trials was a sham, yet He knew God's will was to sacrifice Him in order to save the world. And for that, it makes me thankful...
Brent 4:05 AM
Wednesday, March 23, 2005
Don't forget we're doing kind of an "Easter story" timeline to help each of us organize our puzzle pieces for the celebration of Easter. So, grab your Bible, get comfy, spend some time in prayer and we'll take a look at Matthew 26: 47--56...the arrest of Jesus.
Remember, the key to a good Bible study is to begin with simple observations using the "5 w's and an 'h'" questions, so here's a few (but you can always add more) to get you started on this section:
WHO are the key “players” in this scene in vv. 47, 49 & 56? HOW was Jesus greeted in v. 49? WHAT was Jesus’ response? WHAT happens in v. 51 & WHAT does Jesus say/do in 52-53? WHAT does Jesus say in v.54—55? WHO does He say it to? WHAT is the reaction of the disciples in v.56?
We learn the Judas is there, as is Jesus. We also learn that at least some of the disciples are there, as are an arresting cohort and some onlookers. Jesus was greeted with a kiss by Judas, who responded by calling him "friend" and telling him to do what he came to do.
Then the scene gets a little out of control. One of the disciples (whom we later learn was Peter) drew a sword and struck a slave of the high priest, cutting off his ear. Now, I can't imagine that Peter was trying to cut off an ear (I think he was trying to kill him), but I feel that Peter's earlier admonition to die before betraying Jesus was a key player in this action.
Jesus tells him to put his sword away...and reminds Peter exactly who is in control of this situation. It isn't the police or the crowd or Judas or the High Priest of anyone else. Christ is in full control of these proceedings: "Or do you not think that I cannot appeal to My Father, and He will at once put at My disposal more than twelve legions of angels? How then, shall the Scriptures be fulfilled, that it must happen this way?" The idea is that He could fix this if necessary, but Scripture has to be fulfilled...and, oh, by the way Peter, there's a whole heck of a lot more of them than there are of us, so put that thing away.
Christ then tells the crowd that it's a bit of overkill to arrest Him this way since he taught in the temple every day that week and now you've come out at night when I was praying and spending time with my friends to come and make the arrest. Then the disciples flee.
What I find interesting is what Matthew leaves out. Mark's account in 14:43-50 does, too...Luke mentions it, though, in 22:47--53. First, Jesus was asked if they should fight with the sword. I'm guessing He either didn't answer quickly enough or they didn't hear the answer because they did strike. Matthew and Mark don't mention it, but Jesus performed a miracle right then and there by healing the ear!
The other Gospels also leave out an interesting event that we see in John 18: 1--11. We learn that Jesus and His disciples frequented this garden. We get details of laterns and torches and weapons. Then in verse 5, Jesus asks them who they are looking for, and when the arresting cohort answers, He says, "I am He." When He said this, they drew back and fell to the ground. I still wonder why the other accounts leave this out!
Think about it for a second. If you'd been sent to arrest Jesus, and had seen a miraculous healing of a slave's ear (whom John identifies as Malchus) as well as what I believe to be a revealing of His glory (which knocked them over...or at least caused them to bow in reverence), how keen would you be on having to put the cuffs on this guy?
But that's what I get out of the arrest account. How often do I see God do things in my midst every single day of my life and miss the main point? All too often, I chalk things up to "happenstance" or "dumb luck" or my own efforts, when God has been in so obviously in control (He even told the soldiers to let his friends go, and they did!) that I should fall down in reverence...well...what does this story do for you?
Brent 4:33 AM
Monday, March 21, 2005
Like I said yesterday, sometimes I struggle with the timeline of the Easter story. I mean, I was raised in a Christian environment and could probably put a lot of the pieces of the puzzle together, but it helps me when I think through the story in terms of what happened on what night or day and at what time did all this transpire.
Don't forget that, when you're studying the Word as a student (as opposed to devotionally) you'll want to get your Bible out, and maybe a notebook. You'll want to be in a comfortable place with good lighting and such...and make sure to spend a few minutes in prayer, too, before starting out.
And, to give you some context to this particular study we're in today, yesterday, we looked at what transpired on Thursday night from 6 to 11:30 PM. Basically, it was the Last Supper and the events that transpired there.
Now, tonight, we'll pick up the story right after that. Turn to Matthew 26: 30-46, and answer these questions (don't read ahead until you've answered them, okay?):
WHERE are they going in v. 30 & WHAT were they doing? WHAT does Jesus tell them and WHAT is Peter’s reaction in vv. 31—33? WHAT is Jesus’ response in v. 34? WHAT is Peter’s reply in v. 35? The others? WHERE are they in v. 36 and WHAT did Jesus ask them to do? WHO is highlighted in v. 37 and WHAT was their emotional state? WHAT is Jesus’ emotional state in v. 38 and WHAT does He ask them to do? WHAT is the content of Jesus’ prayer in v.39 & v. 42? WHAT do the disciples do in v. 40 & in v. 43? Does it happen again in v. 44?
You'll find that they sang a hymn and then headed out to the Mount of Olives. Jesus talks to Peter and tells him they will all fall away, and says He will be raised in verse 32. Peter tells Jesus the other guys might fall away, but he won't...to which Jesus tells him that not only will he fall away, but he'll deny Christ 3 times before the sun comes up. All the disciples tell Him they'll die before that happens.
In verse 36, they arrive at the garden at Gethsemene and Jesus tell them to sit while He goes to pray. He took Peter, James and John (the two sons of Zebedee) a bit closer, who were greatly grieved and distressed. He asks them to keep watch while He prays, and He, too is greatly grieved. He went away to pray, and twice He tells the Father He wants the "cup" removed from Him, but if the Father wants, He will succomb to the Father's will for Him. The disciples fall asleep three times.
There is a great correlation in Luke 22: 39--46. There we get a little more information as to what Christ was going through. We learn that He wanted the disciples to pray "that they may not enter temptation." We learn that the disciples were a stone's throw away. We learn that angels were ministering to Jesus. We then get a description of what it means to have His soul greatly distressed: He was in "agony", praying "fervently" so that His sweat became as drops of blood. (It's been proven that under times of extreme duress that blood can come out of your sweat glands--an condition called haematedrosis). We learn what He said to them after He woke them up, too. Read through it and see what else you can glean an piece this part of the story together with the first part.
So, what do you get by way of application? For me, it's the idea that I can so easily identify with the disciples, that no matter how well-intentioned I am, I can "fall asleep" on the job. That kind of thing where I can set out to study the Word, or pray for my students, or my family...whatever...and still get easily distracted by maybe a nice meal, or the lateness of the hour, or failure to understand the gravity of what's going on around me. Oddly enough, it usually ends the same way it does for the disciples...more on that tomorrow as we study the arrest.
Brent 10:28 PM
I still get confused when it comes to the Easter story.
I mean, I've heard the elements of the story since I was a little kid and it often becomes some sort of "soup" that I can't really figure out what happened and when it happened. You know, there was the Last Supper, and Judas left. And Peter was denying knowing Christ. And the disciples fled. And Annas and a high priest and Pilate were involved. And a criminal got freed. And there were two criminals on either side of Christ. Somebody carried the cross for Christ. I really get goofed up on what happened when Christ was on the cross and what was said. And didn't Christ was the disicples' feet and didn't Peter try to kill somebody in there somewhere, too?
That's where Dawson McAllister helps me out.
When I was a senior in high school I went to a "Dawson McAllister Conference." I think he still does youth rallies, and me and a few friends attended one when he came through town. He'd just written a workbook called "A Walk With Christ to the Cross" and the focus of the weekend rally was teaching us the time line.
What was particularly interesting is that I decided to take some teens from our church to a Dawson McAllister rally and he was doing a "15th Anniversary" tour of the same workbook that I went through when I was in high school.
The reason that he could revisit that workbook is because it was a great teaching tool...it's very well organized and breaks the last hours of Christ's ministry on earth into a very orderly timeline.
So, this week, we'll be using his timeline as our outline, and we'll use some of the Bible study methods that we used last week as our guide. Today, we'll start with Jesus on Thursday night around 6PM.
Grab your Bible and turn to Matthew 26: 19--29, and answer these questions before you move on.
WHAT time of year is it? (v. 19) WHO is there? (v.20) WHAT did Jesus say & WHAT was the reaction in vv. 21—25? WHAT did Jesus do in v. 26? WHY did He do that? What did He do in v. 27? WHY did He do that in v. 27-29?
We learn that it's the Passover, so that would make it the springtime...and from the context we know that it's about 33 A.D. We know that the 12 disciples are there, and they're reclining at a table. Jesus informs them that one of them would betray Him. Each one said they wouldn't be the one who did, and Jesus told them it would be the one who put his hand in the bowl with Him would be the betrayer, and that it would be better to have never been born than to be the betrayer. Judas asked if it would be him and Jesus let him know that it very well was.
In verse 26, Jesus took some bread, said a blessing and gave it to his disciples. After that we see that he took some wine from a cup, gave it to them, and after each one told them the symbolism of it. That the bread was symbolic of His body, and the wine was symbolic of blood, which would be shed for many to forgive sins. Then He told his followers that He would have no wine until he drank it with them when they were in the Kingdom. I'd imagine this made John 6: 66-68 come to life for the 12.
We've come to know this time as The Last Supper. Famous paintings (albeit littered with poor interpretations of what was really happening in that room) have been made of this moment. In fact, most churches celebrate this supper on a regular basis as a time to focus on the work Christ did for us as well as point us to the time in which we will have many suppers with Him in The Kingdom...frankly, I think of that every time our church takes communion.
This is where CORRELATION is helpful too. In fact, there's a whole book of correlations that out of print now but it's called The Life of Christ in Stereo and it has all these stories in order, pulling events from different Gospel accounts.
Added accounts are found in:
John 13: 1--20. Read it and look for time differences from the Matthew account before going further.
This account picks up after supper and before they sing the hymn in the Matthew account. Jesus got up from supper and took the attire of a slave, and then washed the disciples' feet...the action of a slave. Peter was incredulous. He couldn't imagine letting Jesus wash his feet and told Him so. Jesus told him he'd understand later, and that He must was Peter's feet or Peter could have no part in the Kingdom. Peter figured that if he had a part in the Kingdom with just a foot washing, then maybe he could get more of a part in the Kingdom by letting Jesus was him from head to toe...and Jesus said that wasn't really necessary. Jesus let them know that they were to serve one another, and even gives more details in the words used during the wine and bread.
Mark 14: 17--21 also offers some insights. It was evening, and we get a cultural concept of reclining at the table and eating...so, picture HOW they were eating. 12 people would be laying down at this table. The room dynamics were likely a "horseshoe" of three tables, with 12 men having their head where the food would be sitting and their feet furthest from the table. That's why the famous DaVinci painting is factually incorrect!
Luke 22: 7--38 gives us a lot of different insights. We get some events of earlier in the day in which Christ sends Peter to find a room so they can celebrate the Passover. It's a pretty amazing way in which he finds it, too. We also get some new insights in verse 23 that the discussion of betrayal then takes place among the disciples and who was actually going to do it. What's also interesting is that all the Kingdom talk began and they were having an argument over who might be the greatest among them (which might explain why Jesus got up and showed them a servant in the John account, and tells us something about why John was so moved by it all). Jesus has some stern words for Peter, and Jesus tells Peter that he will betray Him three times before the rooster crows. They find two swords as well.
All of this transpires during the equivalent of Thursday, 6 to 11:30 PM.
Now, for the applications, and what I'd like for the comments to be this week is what God is teaching YOU as you do your personal studies. Mine today is finding ways to serve people that I don't really like. I mean, Christ showed servanthood to His disciples and THEY WERE ABOUT TO BETRAY HIM! They were going to backstab Him, yet He loved them and taught them to serve and love one another. I guess sometimes I need to work on loving and serving those who are more difficult to love and serve...
Brent 5:47 AM
Sunday, March 20, 2005
Don't forget, after reviewing last week's study of Observation, Interpretation, Correlation that there's a most important step: Application.
In other words, you have to apply the truths that you learned from your study and apply it to your life. This usually happens by discovering something you need to change or do or fix or create...
That's the difficult part.
The best part is that last word I used: Create.
Once you've learned lessons from God, it's very helpful to teach others what you learned. It could be to create a Bible study. It could be to compose a children's song. It could be to paint a painting of the section you studied. It could be a photograph. It could be to blog about it. A short story. I could go on for quite a while about all the stuff you could do...
But the most important part is to actually "do it." Create something innovative as a teaching tool for others. It's really your own little act of worship when you think about it.
We're going to review all these steps in class tonight by actually having you study the Bible. I'll do the correlations, but you'll be studying in small groups...so bring your Bible and a pen that works and be prepared to answer basic "5 w's and an h" questions. You might find it helpful to read through Matthew 26 through 28 as that will be the basic text we use.
And, oh yeah, based on our Palm Sunday class from last week: Do you remember when I showed you the application that comic strip artist Johnny Hart uses in "B.C.?" How he uses that strip every year on Palm Sunday as his own little worship space? He did it again today...so get your Sunday paper and check out his fine work today. It's very inspirational how he can do that...
Brent 4:39 AM
Friday, March 18, 2005
A good friend of mine had to testify in a court of law this week. He'd never done anything like that before, so he called a lawyer to ask him how he should respond to the questions he got from the attorney.
The lawyer-friend used this example to encourage my friend:
He asked, "Do you know what time it is, Franz? (names have been changed to protect the innocent!)
Franz answered, "Yes. It's 10:15."
"Wrong!" said the lawyer friend. "You need to remember that it's going to be very simple if you only answer the question the attorney asks you when you're on the stand! The correct answer is simply, 'Yes.' If the examining attorney wanted to know the time, after you answered, they'd ask, 'Good. Then what time is it right now?' And then, you might only want to answer, "According to my watch, it's 10:15."
Well, in Luke 19, the Lawyers gave Jesus a "yes or no" type choice. Remember, the last few days we've been working through the Palm Sunday story, and we left off with Jesus heading into Jerusalem with the surrounding disciples singing a Messianic psalm. In effect, Jesus, riding into Jerusalem the week before Passover on a donkey, was being announced as the Messiah in a formal, meaningful manner.
And the Pharisees would've known it, too. That's why they say what they do in Luke 19: 39: "Teacher, rebuke your disciples."
The message is firm. Jesus, this borders on blasphemy and this parade needs to stop. You should do it, too. They'll listen to you, and well, that'll make for a very peaceful Passover week. If not, we're probably going to have to kill you...or at least a very good scourging. So, just stop them and we'll go about our festival.
It's a "yes or no" option. It's what the lawyers want. Pretty simple, really.
Yet, Jesus gives a cryptic answer in verse 40: "I tell you, if these become silent, the stones will cry out." The Message reads, "If the people kept quiet, the stones would do it for them, shouting praise."
Why would He answer it this way instead of the yes or no?
The answer begins in Daniel 9: 24--27:
"70 weeks have been decreed for your people and your holy city, to finish the transgression, to make an end of sin, to make atonement for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy, and to annoint the most holy place."
The interpretation, in order to save you some time, means that it'll take 490 years ("weeks" in Hebrew means "periods of 7," of which you have to see the sentence context to determine if it means weeks, months or years) for The Messiah to make everything right again.
Then in verse 25: "So you are to know and discern that from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah the Prince there will be seven weeks and 62 weeks; it will be built again..."
So, we keep track of time beginning with a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem. Then, there will be a time frame that looks like this, (7 x 7) + (62 x 7) = y. I know. It's math, but trust me on this one. It means 49 + 434 = y. Y = 483. So, we're missing 7 years...which I'll explain in a second.
But 483 years, when broken into days, is 173,880. So, once we find a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem, we can find out when the Messiah will come, right? That's what it says.
Well, in Nehemiah 2...we see in verse 7 that Nehemiah gets the king to sign a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem. We learn in 2:1 that it's March/April of 444 B.C.
So, if you go 173,880 days forward, from March/April 444 B.C., you'll wind up in late March of 33 A.D.
And, Jesus strolled into Jerusalem riding a colt on exactly 173,880 days from the day that decree was signed.
That's why He didn't give a "yes or no" answer. It would've sounded more like, "Fellas, I'd love to. But, see...ummmm...this day was prophesied about 173,880 days ago--since you are Lawyers I thought you'd know that--and according to Habbakkuk 2: 10, well, if the Messiah isn't announced today...well, yeah...your reality is that you'll have a huge problem because the stones will start announcing the arrival of the Messiah. Because God's Word doesn't lie. And try explaining a lot of rocks singing that same song to your Passover crowd, while you're at it, too.
(Now, the missing 7 years that will have to take place to complete the 490 years...in Daniel 9: 26 tells us that after the 62nd week--see our math equation above--the Messiah will be cut off. And yet all the Messiah's works won't have been done yet. Well, read 9:27 and you'll see language that is similar to Revelation, and if you know anything about the Tribulation that it is 7 years long, beginning from the Rapture of the Church...so, after the rapture, that clock starts ticking,too)
So, think about it. You're holding a book near you that is accurate down to the very single DAY.
And if it's correct about that much history to that degree of accuracy, well, wouldn't it be correct about WHO Christ is and the work He did on the Cross (which we'll look at next week) for us? What can we do to apply these truths and realities?
Brent 10:05 PM
After you've gone through and made your observations, and then taken some time to do some interpretations, the next step is to touch base with all the Scriptures that correlate to the text you're studying.
One easy tool to help out with this is to look at the reference verses that are listed beside the verses you're studying that tell you where the story (or words, or quotes, or other related topics) is told in other places. This works VERY well in the Gospels, and in this instance (since we're looking at Luke 19: 28--40), you can also find the story of Palm Sunday in three other places:
Matthew 21: 1--9. Mark 11: 1--10. and John 12: 12--15.
Take the time right now to read Luke 19: 28--40, and then write down some comparisons with the other stories. What is the same? What gives more insight? See, the different writers of the Gospels all had unique views of the same event, and, as you correlate the accounts you can get a more vivid picture of what is going on overall.
Correlation can also can help with interpretation as well. The reference verses in my particular study Bible next to verse 35 (which mentions the Messiah entering on a colt) lists Zechariah 9: 9, which reads, "Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion! Shout in triumph, O daughter of Jerusalem! Behold your king is coming to you; He is just and endowed with salvation, humble, and mounted on a donkey, even on a colt, the foal of a donkey."
So, if we are paying attention to the references, we learn that the coming Messiah will enter Jerusalem on the foal of a donkey.
In Luke 19: 38, we see a quoted verse from the Old Testament. My Bible lists the quote as coming from Psalm 118: 26. In Jesus day, this particular Psalm was understood as a "Messianic" one, one in which the Messiah was discussed in detail.
Now, because you've correlated some things, you can now enrich your interpretations. So, for example, if the Messiah is supposed to come into Jerusalem on a donkey, and there's a man riding a donkey into the city...maybe that is meaningful.
Then, add to that the reality that a crowd around this guy is singing a Messianic song...well, now we've got quite a stir in this small city that is gearing up for the Passover festival (those two interpretations could've been gotten yesterday as you were looking up Jerusalem, or "after these things"). You've got a parade to announce the coming Messiah!
And this might explain the Pharisees (experts in the Law, again something you could've interpreted yesterday) and their reaction. See, they likely understood PRECISELY what was going on: They knew the Messiah was supposed to enter Jerusalem on a donkey, and they knew the song about the Messiah. And now, Jesus, who has been causing all sorts of trouble over a three-year period in and around Jerusalem, is making quite the statement.
They also know that if this statement is allowed to continue, they would have to execute Jesus. You can't go around proclaiming to be God without either being right or being executed. The Pharisees, I can assure you, obviously don't believe Jesus is right.
Hence the statement: "Jesus, rebuke your disciples." Make them stop. For your own good, sir. We get what they're saying. We get what you're doing. And if it doesn't come to an end PRONTO, you're going to die a wretchedly horrible and humiliating death. Just letting you know, sir. So, we're giving you a chance to fix this mess right now. You'd best do it if you know what's good for everybody and we can enjoy a reasonably fun Passover festival together.
And now we have Jesus answering in a very cryptic manner in verse 40 of Luke 19: "And He answered and said, 'I tell you, if these become silent, the stones will cry out.'"
For your own study today, follow the reference chain in your study Bible from Luke 19: 40. You'll wind up in Habbakkuk and then follow your chain of verses from there. At some point, you'll wind up in Daniel 9, which will give us a lot of insight into why Jesus answered the question the way He did...
...and we'll pick up there tomorrow!
Brent 5:30 AM
Thursday, March 17, 2005
So...hopefully you made your observations from yesterday's blog and now you can begin to make interpretations of your observation.
Just to make sure we're clear on the subtle difference, let's use a basic example. Let's say that you were in your backyard in just before you went to bed last night. This morning, when you woke up, you found a baseball sitting in the middle of your backyard. The OBSERVATION is "there's a baseball in my backyard."
The INTERPRETATION could go in a bunch of different directions, but the most obvious one is "how did that baseball get there?"
So, you might have to scroll down to review the observations we made yesterday, but a few questions of interpretation you might make based on the "Palm Sunday" (which is this upcoming Sunday, in case you weren't aware, and the reason I've chosen this passage) account found in Luke 19: 28--40.
WHERE is Jerusalem (verse 28)? WHERE is Bethphage and Bethany and the Mount of Olives? (verse 29) WHO were the two disciples? (verse 30) WHAT does it mean to spread their garments in the road? (verse 36) WHAT psalm is quoted in verse 38 and WHY would this be meaningful? WHO were the Pharisees? (verse 39) WHY would they ask Jesus to rebuke His disciples? (verse 39) WHY would Jesus say that the stones would cry out if He did that? (verse 40)
Now, some of these questions would require more information than you might have just rattling around in your brain. You'll need some help.
Most good Bibles will have a series of maps in the back of them. Try to find one that is titled something like "Jerusalem in the time of Jesus" and then locate the cities. You might even find the Mount of Olives on there,too.
The two disciples are going to be discovered in other gospel accounts of this same event, so we'll leave that alone for now as tomorrow we'll be looking at correlations.
Spreading the garments in the road would be a custom of that day, so you might need a Bible dictionary...and since most people don't have one of those around, let me give you a few web-sites, that last time I checked, had free search engines and things to help you interpret some things:
Bible Online SonicLight.Com Bible.Org (click on study tools or pastoral helps--it even has a "net Bible" too)
At Sonic Light, you can click on Study notes, then click on Psalms, scroll down to Psalm 118, and you should be able to find out why this Psalm was very important.
In your Bible dictionary, you could look up "Pharisees" and get LOTS of information.
And if you wanted a quick answer to the questions of Luke 19: 39 & 40, you could easily use SonicLight, go to Luke, scroll to chapter 19 and find out a few things.
Now, you're really studying the Bible on your own...and you could teach a small group Bible study just on what you've learned here! Half the battle is asking the right questions and doing the research...and the confidence you gain is sort of repeats the process.
You know, you begin to study seriously, you learn a lot and you even enjoy the process, you gain confidence, you do it again, you get better at it, you get more confidence, you get better studies as a result, you gain more confidence, etc.
And...all you've done so far is observe and interpret...tomorrow we'll correlate this information with other passages and you'll see how very cool it is to see God's Word work together.
So, what's going well for you and what isn't? Feel free to comment with successes, failures, etc.
Brent 4:37 AM
Wednesday, March 16, 2005
Yesterday we took a look at devotional Bible study...simply reading the Word of God for the express purpose of enjoying your relationship with God. It gives you a chance to slow down and focus on eternal things rather than temporary ones.
Today I'd like to look at more serious Bible study. The type you might want to do if you're preparing to teach a Sunday School class or a small group...or maybe you just have some question in your brain after reading and want to know more about something in Scripture you've read. There's no question that it's possible to have loads of questions if you're reading devotionally.
In fact, there's a fancy word for serious Bible study: Hermeneutics. It was one of the first classes on the required curriculum at seminary, and I had the privilege (and I use that word measuredly) of taking the class when it was taught by Dr. Howard Hendricks and Dr. Mark Bailey (who has since become president of Dallas Seminary).
Anyway, the first thing they did in that class was to show us a short film. It was about 30 seconds long and it depicted a man and woman at a bus stop, a car pulls up and somebody kidnaps the lady and they drive off. Afterward, they gave us a test.
About 60 questions or so. On a 30 second film.
Things like, "What was written on the license plate?" "What hand did the kidnapper hold the gun in?" "What was on the sign above the restaurant?" Very detailed questions.
We all failed the test miserably. I think I got like 15 correct.
Then they gave us the questions ahead of time, gave us 5 minutes to look them over, and showed the film again. This time, since we were prepared to look at everything, we all did much better. Scores in the 40's and 50's this time.
And it's that way with Bible study. The first thing we need to do is make simple observations. You know:
Who What Where When Why and How
So, let's do that with Luke 19. Like reading devotionally, you'll need to get in a comfy place with plenty of room and an environment in which you can concentrate. Then don't forget to pray for God to lead your thoughts.
Unlike reading devotionally, you'll need a consistent, reliable translation. My preference is the New American Standard. The New International reads a bit more smoothly, and I think both of those are good choices. They each have their strengths and weaknesses...but they're both very good.
And then you'll dive in...just be careful not to make interpretations just yet. Simple observations.
First, read Luke 19: 28--40, but break it into paragraphs, too.
WHEN are these events taking place (verse 28...but you'd have to interpret it so just find the obvious answer and move on for right now...we'll work on interpretation tomorrow)? WHERE are these events taking place (verse 29)? WHO is involved in the entire story (verse 29, 31, 33, 37 & 39)? WHAT did "He" tell them to do (verses 30--34)? WHY did "He" tell them to do that (verse 35)? HOW did Jesus arrive in verses 35 & 36? WHAT did the crowd do (verses 37-38)? WHAT question was asked in verse 39? WHO asked that question? WHO answered the question if verse 40? WHAT was the answer to the question?
Then, put these events into your own words.
And you've just taken the first step in a more serious Bible study: simple observations. Keep these answers on a sheet of paper or in a notebook, and then we'll work on it more tomorrow, when we start making interpretations of our observations.
I've been told that government agents who are trained to spot counterfeit currency aren't shown a myriad of fake bills and then told to go spot other fakes. They're trained to make simple observations on a true bill to such a degree that they can spot any fake because they are such keen observers of the real ones.
You'll get better at making observations over time, too. With practice, you'll start doing it inherently...in fact, for that class I made over 150 observations from just one verse later in the semester (and I had friends make well over 250) so it is indeed a learned trait.
So, give it a shot and see how well you can make simple observations of a passage...
Brent 3:39 AM
Tuesday, March 15, 2005
My days at Dallas Theological Seminary were coming to a close. I graduated in the fall semester and much of my classwork was completed before the Thanksgiving break, but I still had some chapel attendance requirements to meet as well as some classroom lectures I wanted to attend so I was on campus for a few days with very little to do.
I wasn't the only one, either. Several of my fellow students were in the same boat, so we spent a lot of time in the student lounge hanging out & having coffee.
One afternoon, somebody at our table asked the question, "What are ya'll looking forward to most without the demands of seminary studies over your head?" Lots of answers were thrown out there:
"I'm going to start giving my youth ministry the attention it deserves." "I'm going to spend more time with my children." "My wife and I are going to start going on dates again." "I'm actually going to start exercising consistently."
And then there was one that stopped the conversation: "I'm going to read WHAT I want, WHEN I want."
We all nodded thoughtfully. Seminary students are readers by nature, and this was the first time we had thought of that. We were no longer under the deadlines. No longer under the requirements. No longer under the burden of tests.
For some reason, it was oddly exciting. We would probably have chosen to read some of those books and enjoyed them, but the fact that it was told to us that we had to read them, and by a certain time, with the extra burden of being tested (or writing a paper) that took all the fun out of it.
And the same can be true of our time in God's Word. There are two ways to read the Bible, one is to enjoy it, and the other is to study it in depth. Tomorrow, I'll focus on how to actually enjoy some detailed study, but today I want to show you some things I've learned about just learning how to spend time in the Word for the purpose of "abiding" in the Word.
First of all, make sure your environment is good for just reading. You know, that it's quiet and comfortable, with good light, and a time when your mind is most alert. For me, it's in the early morning, in my well-worn but comfy recliner with my light right above it and a warm cup of coffee. For you it might be night or right after school or sports to unwind. Just know your "peak" time.
Secondly, pray that God would help you block out all the crud in your brain that would hinder you from just enjoying what you read. Those pressures of the day ahead (or behind) or the stresses of your life or whatever mind garbage that could creep into it.
Next, have a "reading plan." It's difficult to dive into random sections of Scripture without direction, so choose a book and read through it, usually a chapter at a time. If you're looking for good book starting points, I'd go with Mark, Psalms and/or James. Once you get in the habit, you can get a little more diverse, but those are good starting points.
Have a readable version of the Bible you enjoy reading. I very much enjoy The Message, by Eugene Peterson, because it puts a new spin on verses I'm very familiar with. It puts things in very contemporary English (and sometimes goes a bit too far, but I can overlook that) and is easy to read.
For example, let's look at Psalm 23, something we're generally familiar with, in the New American Standard Version:
"The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want. He makes me lie down in green pastures; He leads me beside quiet waters. He restores my soul. He guides me in the paths of righteousness for His name's sake. Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil; for Thou art with me; Thy rod and Thy staff, they comfort me. Thou dost prepare a table before me int he presence of my enemies; Thou has anointed my head with oil; My cup overflows. Surely goodness and lovingkindness will follow me all the days of my life, and I will dwell in the house of the Lord forever."
Now, let's look at the same verses from The Message:
"God, my shepherd! I don't need a thing. You have bedded me down in lush meadows, you find me quiet pools to drink from. True to your word, you let me catch my breath and send me in the right direction. Even when they way goes through Death Valley, I'm not afraid when you walk at my side. Your trusty shepherd's crook makes me feel secure. You serve me a six-course dinner right in front of my enemies. You revive my drooping head; my cup brims with blessing. Your beauty and love chase after me every day of my life. I'm back home in the house of God for the rest of my life."
And then when I've read the passage in such a devotional way, I ask two questions: What does it say about me? What does it say about God? And then I spend some time thinking those two questions through...like, how am I like a sheep? How many blessings do I have?
Or, God gives me security and protection. Why do I fear? Things like this. I give my mind the freedom to be led by Him and try to "listen" to Him.
It's really that simple to read devotionally, and I try to do that every day...just to grow closer to Him by being still and quiet before Him.
The question today is obvious: Do you read devotionally? What practical steps can I take to be more consistent? What has worked well for me that I could share with others in the comments?
Brent 4:03 AM
Monday, March 14, 2005
Time.
I know. We're all busy. Very busy. Warp-speed busy.
And telling you that you need to be in the Word of God on a consistent basis in corporate settings is like telling you to find around a half an hour more in your already busy day. Yet, Christ Himself said we're supposed to "abide" in His Word...literally "live" in it.
And telling you this probably conjures up images in your mind that have negative connotations. Impersonal church services. Classes at early hours. Lots of boring lectures. Difficult concepts taught by people that only have to study that stuff who don't live "normal" lives outside church. Pressure of being surrounded by people that look like they "get it" when we don't "get it."
So, combine more time demands with negative connotations...and, well, there's a reason that famous people make comments like the reality that Christianity hasn't been found wanting, but rather it's been unTRIED. Christianity is a mile wide and an inch deep. Stuff like that.
How do you overcome those connotations?
First, you have to make a decision that you're going to grow spiritually. It's like exercising consistently after a long bout of being a couch potato. At first you seem "too tired" to go to the gym and too undisiciplined to eat the right things, but once you get started, you find that you have more energy to go about your day and that you feel more alert because you're eating correctly. It's the same spiritually. You might feel like you'll lose even more of your valuable time if you make a commitment to get in the Word...but I suggest you'll find that you'll actually create more time in your day as you begin to prioritize based on eternal principles and concepts instead of allowing temporary, earthly concerns drive your calendar.
This will involve making a decision to be a part of "corporate" teaching times such as attending a church service where the Word is taught. Maybe a Sunday School class. Maybe a small group Bible study. Maybe a "seminar" type class to get specialized learning in certain areas. You'll have to make your own "soup" out of all the options for this, but it's certainly a part of your time in the Word.
So, for today...think through your daily schedule and commitments. How many of them are "eternal" involvements? How many are necessary, but "earthly" concerns? What type of balance do you have and how, if need be, can you find time to get in the Word? What kinds of "soup" are in your mix for corporate time in the Word? Does your church offer you times where you can take "seminar" type classes or more formal age-appropriate classes? What practical steps can you take to have a healthy balance in your life?
Tomorrow, we'll look at personal daily devotions and what should transpire there?
Brent 6:03 AM
Sunday, March 13, 2005
Tonight in class, we'll be learning how to do a personal Bible study. The text we'll be using will be from Luke 19: 28--44. My hope is that you'll simply skim over the entire book of Luke (really, just flip through the pages and skim them so you'll get the "flow" of the whole book instead of a having an isolated section of the Bible to look at). But slow down and read chapters 18 and 20, too, so you'll have context when you get there.
Also, you might want to mark Nehemiah 2, Zechariah 9, Habakkuk 2 and Daniel 9 as well. Just so you can turn the pages more quickly as these verses will be used in the "correlation" part of our study. We'll have a busy Bible.
But in the Luke section, ask yourself who are the key players, where are they, and put what happens in your own words, and that should get you ready for our "lab" on how to study the Word when you're by yourself.
Brent 4:03 AM
Saturday, March 12, 2005
When I was taking youth ministry classes in seminary, frankly, I had more experience than most of my classmates. I had been in youth ministry full-time for six years prior to taking classes (while most of my fellow students were just starting out in their ministries). I had taught hundreds of Bible lessons before crowds of varying sizes. I had taught a wide range of topics. I had been teaching many different small group Bible studies, too.
One particular class was called "Teaching Process." Yes, the class was precisely about what it was called...
Anyway, on the first day of that class, the professor asked us what was our goal when we taught our students.
People in the class offered up several different answers. It was obvious that we were all around the answer but not getting the answer...you know? We were aware of this because the teacher kept waiting for us to offer more answers.
I think I said something like, "To clearly communicate God's truth." Or something similar that would either make me sound good or get the professor to get that look on his face that one of his students got the answer correctly.
I think the professor said something like, "Yeah...we want to clearly communicate God's truth, that's certainly a good goal. But I'm thinking more about our students. What do we want to see in our students as a result of our teaching?"
To me, that sounded something like, "Wrong answer, goofball...but a nice try. You're still missing the point of what I'm trying to get." I wasn't about to try again, either.
Nobody got the answer. Finally, the professor asked us to turn to 1 Timothy 1:5:
"But the goal of our instruction is love from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith."
It's a short sentence. It's easy to glaze over, too. Well-meaning and well-intended platitudes that no one could really disagree with. It's like a politician saying he's for lower taxes and better education and taking care of the poor: You can't disagree with it, but it seems vague enought that you don't know exactly "how" it'll happen, either. So you just say, "Isn't that nice?" and move on.
But that short, well-meaning verse refocused my ministry.
See, for my first years of ministry, I had been putting together Bible studies that I hoped were clever, and innovative and clear in what they were trying to communicate. I was trying to get students to see the beauty of the Word of God and understand that it was intended to get them to live an abundant life.
Those are good things. But they're more like the red circles around the bullseye on a target. They aren't the bullseye.
The bullseye of time in the Word...the very breath of God...the living and active Word of God...
...is love.
In this case, the Greek word agape, which means a love for which no sacrifice is too great.
So the goal is that people will choose to love God more...with a love for which NO sacrfice is too great.
And I believe that this would naturally lead to people choosing to love others more...with a love for which no sacrfice is too great.
This love is to come from three things:
A pure heart. The Message translates this "uncontaminated by self-interest." I wonder if we really thought through that and found out how self-focused we are and how much we make choices based on our selves how much we'd want to live a life with a pure heart.
A good conscience. Elements of hypocrisy erased.
A sincere faith. The opposite of this would be a counterfeit faith. A fake one. One in which we focused on what others thought instead of what was really going on in our hearts and minds and actions and dealing with those things.
See, living a life that is littered with self-interest, a guilty conscience and hypocrisy it tiring. It will wear you out. It's self-focused and won't give you time to love others or truly love Him.
And when you realize that the result of time in the Word should be, plain and simply, love. Built of the foundation of a worthy, honest walk with Him.
That one class hour that focused on this verse refocused my energies in ministry that last to this day.
A friend of mine who is in a Christian band said something like this over dinner, "Anybody, with enough practice and enough effort can have kids walk away from a concert saying, 'Wow! What a great band!' It's hard to have kids walk away from a concert saying, 'Wow, what a great God He is and He loves me, and the guys in that band love me.'"
It's the same way with a Bible study or sermon. It's easy, with enough practice and effort to have people walk away from Sunday School saying, "Wow! What a great lesson and creative presentation!" and mean it.
It's difficult to have students walk away saying "Wow! What a great God He is and He loves me, and that guy who taught it loves me, and I want to love others."
But that's the goal.
And it should be.
So the question today is how much do we really love God considering the amount of time we spend in the Word? How much do we really love others?
Brent 4:57 AM
Friday, March 11, 2005
I grew up in what is known as The Deep South...Dixie, if you will. South of the Mason-Dixon Line, east of the Mississippi River, north of Florida, west of the Atlantic Ocean.
There is a pride in being from there, much like I've discovered that Texans have a similar pride since I've moved here. There are simply "ways" of doing things that you can't really explain to outsiders.
And there was this ideal of a "Southern Gentleman" that we were taught as young men growing up that there were things you simply did because they were sort of "trademarks" of men raised in the South. I was raised that you opened the door for women, both to cars and to buildings. You never told certain types of jokes or stories in mixed company. You shook hands firmly. You looked people in the eye. Anyone older than you was "ma'am" or "sir." You were staunchly Democratic (because, after all, the Republicans were involved in that Civil War nastiness). You went to the church of your choice and were actively involved in it. You respected your elder family members. I could go on, but suffice to say that there were a lot of ideals that were firmly entrenched in my brain at an early age.
Then, as you got older, you started to see these things a bit differently. I had a girl tell me she was fully capable of opening her own doors, thank you. The jokes and stories were told by both sexes in mixed company. You didn't shake hands much as it was more things like "high fives" or whatever else was in style at that time. You didn't judge someone as "shify" if they didn't look you in the eye. A Republican was elected both to the presidency and the governor's office in the first elections I voted in. Lots of people stopped going to church. You eventually lost respect for elders just because they were older.
One night some friends and I were talking about that...about why it changed when we got older. If I remember the tone of that conversation it had to do with "old fashioned" ideas and there was a "new" Southern Gentleman and that "times had changed" and it simply didn't work "for a new generation." We even thought it was possible that those ideals worked for a time, but now they just didn't apply in our time and in our situation.
And that's what people often say about the Bible...that is simply doesn't fit our culture. They're good ideas and all, but it just doesn't work in the new millinnium.
The Bible wholeheartedly disagrees. Check out Hebrews 4:12-13. It says, "For the word of God is living and active and sharper than any two edged sword, and piercing as far as the soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart."
So, let's see:
Living. As opposed to dead. So, maybe it does apply here and now if it's alive.
Maybe it's alive...but just too old. Sorry, it's also "active."
It's sharp. The Message says that it's as "sharp as a surgeon's scalpel."
It's piercing to the joints and marrow. Lots of sermons have been preached on this section, but again, The Message is very helpful as the Word "cuts through everything, whether doubt or defense, laying us open to listen and obey."
Think about these things for today. Do we really view God's Word as highly contemporary for today? If so, when we read it, do we allow it cut us like we would a surgeon...being vulnerable in that manner...letting it lay us open? Do we listen to it? Do we choose to obey it?
I know it's only one verse.
But it's the right tool for us to help us work our way through our daily life.
Brent 4:05 AM
Thursday, March 10, 2005
The baseball coach at my high school was very big on the concept of "team." It was all very stereotypical, really. Every player knowing his role. Every player covering his responsbilility. Every player using his strengths. Every player understanding the big picture. Everybody doing what's necessary for the team to win.
That all changed after the season in 1984.
That was the year my class graduated.
He asked all the seniors to come to his office. There was plenty of time since the season was over and we still had a class period for baseball built into our school day. Sitting in his office that day...well, the tone changed a bit.
Now it was about us as individuals, he said. Most of us were going off to college and would be living on our own for the first time, and I guess he wanted to dispense advice. Since I didn't have a dad in my teen years, I looked up to this coach a great deal. In fact, I wrote the things he said that day in my journal.
YOU need to keep on eating right. YOU need to make sure to sleep right. (He said absolutely NOTHING GOOD happens after 2AM, so you definitely need to be in by that time) YOU need to make going to classes a priority, and when you go to class, pay attention. If YOU do those three simple things, college will be a snap for YOU.
At the time, we all nodded. Yeah, Coach, we got it. In theory, anyway, we did have it. It was the application that was difficult.
And in retrospect, he was absolutely correct. When I went by those things, my college life was a snap. It was when I'd start violating those simple things that there would be chaos in my life and grades would slip and I'd feel all sorts of pressure. I got serious about them pretty late in my sophomore year, and once I applied them consistently, well, suffice to say that I graduated from university in 3 years. My friends made fun of my "early" bed times (like midnight, but that was early for college) and how much time I spent reading and how dedicated I was about going to class and all that.
He was just giving the best advice he could give knowing what he knew about us.
And that's what Paul, the wise, aged pastor, was giving to Timothy, his understudy at the time when they were going their separate ways. Paul knew he was heading to his death at the hands of the Roman government. Timothy would be taking over. And here's what advice Paul gave to him (from The Message):
"But don't let it [pastors who would exploit the faith for personal gain] faze you. Stick with what you learned and believed, sure of the integrity of your teachers--why, you took in the sacred Scriptures with your mother's milk! There's nothing like the written Word of God for showing you the way to salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. Every part of Scripture is God-breathed in one way or another--showing us the truth, exposing our rebellion, correcting our mistakes, training us to live God's way. Through the Word we are put together and shaped up for the tasks God has for us."
It's really some simple little things at first glance. Very simple little edicts. But some terribly sound insights...and they're all PERSONAL to Timothy. It even starts out with something like, "don't let the reality that others are snakes faze YOU." See, it's personal.
Stick with what YOU already learned. Stick with what YOU came to believe. YOU learned these from YOUR teachers. YOU took in the word from YOUR parents.
And this salvation you learned about is what all Scripture points to. I love the reality that Eugene Peterson, prolific author and translator of The Message translates verse 3:16 "God breathed." While he'll often play fast and loose with other bits of translation in that book, in this instance he stays literal. All Scripture is the very breath of God. It's alive! It's the Holy God of the universe TALKING to us!
I often hear teenagers say things like, "Well, I'd believe in God if I only knew how to get in touch with Him. If I knew what He'd say and saw it for myself, then I'd believe."
Paul is making the point that God is speaking to you. Through these sacred writings, it's like He is sitting across the table from you at the local Starbucks, telling you what He wants.
And what He wants is to show us the truth. He wants to show us our rebellious hearts. He wants us to correct our mistakes. He wants to train us like a soldier to live His way.
Why?
So we can be "in shape" for the work He designed for us at the beginning of time.
How do we figure that out?
Through listening to His breath.
It may be words on a page, but they may as well be said out loud to us. Frankly, if we learn the truth, discover our rebellion, correct those areas and allow ourselves to be trained for the work God has for us to do...well, those really are simple edicts. Like the ones my coach gave me, the trick is in applying them.
But they are simple edicts. And they are PERSONAL.
So, for today, how does this view of Scripture encourage you to want to spend more time in the Word? How can you apply those simple edicts? What practical steps can you use to get in the Word more...to "live there" like John 8:31 says?
Brent 4:39 AM
Wednesday, March 09, 2005
The children's ministry at our church has a rack of age-appropriate Bibles that sits on a rack they can wheel from room to room as needed for various teaching needs.
Our visitor center has a crate of Bibles to lend in case you forgot yours or if you didn't know you'd need it (side not: I'm floored by the reality that certain churches have gotten to the point where they just print out the necessary verses on screens or in bulletins because they don't want anybody to be offended or foolish if they didn't bring a Bible).
Our "lost & found" shelf routinely fills up with Bibles. Every now and then I'll see one with a name of someone I know, and when I inform them, they tell me that there's no hurry. They've been using their other one and they'll pick it up next week.
Our student ministry gives away the Bibles that have been left in our youth room for three months. The boxes usually take two people to carry.
If you go to a local Christian retailer, you can be overwhelmed by the numerous styles of Bibles on the wall, not to mention the 40 or so various translations. Hardcover, leather cover, paperback, small enough for your purse, large enough for serious study, large print...and do you need a Bible cover with that, too, sir? We have about 40 styles to match...everything from NFL-football leather to businessman black leather to teenager nylon. Highlighter pack to go with that, sir?
We really have a lot of Bibles and Bible options. Maybe it's because of the reality that I work for a "Bible" church that I'm pretty serious about mine...but somebody's out there using all these Bibles, right? I mean, retailers wouldn't carry them if they didn't make money, right?
And don't get me wrong. This isn't a bad thing at all. It sounds silly in some ways, but there's no excuse for anyone in my neck of the woods not to have a Bible...and one they can read and understand.
It's just that we've come a long way from Martin Luther sitting in a room putting God's Word into the common man's hands...and having to wait on the culture's ability to reproduce it quickly enough for the masses to get their own copy.
When you think about it, it's only been about 400 years of history that mankind has had the entirety of God's Word for their own possession...and I wonder if we're not somewhat callous to that reality.
Let's take a look at Nehemiah 8.
Remember, this is at the end of a 400 year period of time that the Jewish nation had been scattered abroad and had lost their heritage. Can you imagine if 400 years went by that Americans were scattered throughout the world, and someone rebuilt the nation, had a celebration, and then waltzed out with a copy of the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights and read them aloud to the assembly? It would have a great deal of meaning to the hearers, wouldn't it? I mean, we'd have some vague recollection of it all...and it would probably get a reaction with the high-minded ideals were heard.
That's what's happening here:
"And Ezra opened the book in the sight of all the people for he was standing above all the people; and when he opened it, all the people stood up. Then Ezra blessed the Lord the Great God. And all the people answered and said, 'Amen, Amen!' while lifting up their hands; they they bowed low and worshipped the Lord with their faces to the ground. [The priests] explained the law to the people while the people remained in their place. And they read from the book, from teh law of God, translating to give the sense so that they understood the reading."
Here at the celebration, Ezra, the priest, brings out the scrolls of the Hebrew Scriptures. He opens the scroll.
The entire nation rises to it's collective feet. Why? They were in reverence for what they were about to hear. Even though they were generations removed from the reality of hearing Scripture on a regular basis, they knew enough to know that this was God...the Creator of the universe...about to speak to them. They stood.
Then they celebrated the reality of God speaking to them by telling God "so be it" (that's what "amen" means). They wanted God's will to be done in and through them.
Then they worshipped Him. They bowed low.
And they hung on every word. Listening to sermons with interpretations...all day.
And I wonder if we've lost a little bit of that reverence for God's word. As if too much of a good thing makes us callous to it. We ho-hum sermons to try to get home to see the game and fail to prioritize our time in the Word personally.
So for today, let's ask ourselves how we view God's Word. Do we take it for what it is or do we have a more lackadaisical approach to it? Why is either focus the case in our lives? What can be done to change it if we are lackadaisical?
Brent 4:45 AM
Tuesday, March 08, 2005
I have always been a voracious reader. I grew up before cable television came on the scene and parents shoved kids in front of the screen to keep them occupied, so it was a necessity. Outside of Sesame Street and The Electric Company that came on in the early morning, the set was off and a book was in my hand.
I loved reading so much that I decided to become an English major at college. That's when I discovered that reading what somebody else tells you that you have to read and have it completed by the time they tell you to have it completed isn't nearly as much fun as choosing what you want to read and enjoying it at your own pace.
Lately, I've been on this kick of reading the books that I either don't remember from high school or some "classic" that I never got assigned in school. The good folks at Barnes and Noble have helped out by buying the copyrights to some of that literature and selling them at ridiculously low prices.
Hands down the best book I ever read was "The Brothers Karamazov" by Fyodor Doestoyevsky. It was an amazing story. It was brilliantly written. Even the story behind it would be worthy of a documentary on the History Channel. Over it's 1,008 pages, it moved me emotionally and made me think about my relationship to God. That's rare.
When you think about it, the Bible is an even more amazing book. It is an amazing story. It is brilliantly written. Almost every story in it is worthy of a documentary on the History Channel (and they've tried, too). Over it's pages, you'll be moved and think about your relationship to God.
But the Bible is even more amazing. The word “Bible” comes from the Greek word biblia—meaning “books.”
The Bible is compiled into 66 books: 39 in the Hebrew Scriptures, 27 in what we call the New Testament. The Hebrew Scriptures were recorded primarily in Hebrew (with parts of Ezra and Daniel written in Aramaic). The New Testament was written in common Greek. The Old Testament can be divided into sections: History, Genesis. Government, like Leviticus. Poetry, like Psalms or Ecclesiastes. Prophecy, like Jeremiah.
The New Testament is similar. There's the Gospels. There's history, like Acts. There's letters, like Colossians. And there's prophecy found in Revelation. The Bible has roughly 40 different authors.
The Bible was written over a period of time from (roughly) 1400 B.C. to 100 A.D. The Jewish scholars before the time of Christ has placed the Old Testament together before the time of Christ.
The New Testament was finalized at the Council of Carthage 397 A.D., which verified a letter by Athanasius in 365.
It is incredibly reliable when compared to other writings. For example, no scholar doubts the authenticity of Caesar's "Gallic Wars" and there are 10 known copies, the earliest of which was written 1,000 years after his death. There are 24,000 known copies written within 30 years of the death of Christ or within 100 years after the death of John.
The biggest difference in a great work of literature and the Bible? The Bible has a unity all pointing to one thing: To get to know the Author. Let's face it. Doestoevsky or Stephen King don't write books so you can have a relationship with them. They write to entertain. To move you. To get you to think. Whatever.
But the Bible's amazing reality that it was written over 1500 or so years by 40 or so different authors who all have the same goal in mind: They want you to get to know God better. To get to understand yourself better.
So, for today, spend some time thanking God that we have so many available copies available to us. And let's ask ourselves why we don't use it for it's intended purpose more, eh?
Brent 4:26 AM
Sunday, March 06, 2005
I really enjoyed the movie "Luther." In fact, if you haven't seen it, it's well worth the time and effort to rent it and watch it. My friend Adam, a Lutheran youth minister, made a joke over coffee one day that the only people who saw it were Lutherans, and while that certainly is a joke, I think most Protestants would benefit from that little slice of our heritage...we tend to be a little deficient in our church history these days.
See, we live in a land where Bibles are plentiful. I do, anyway. I mean, there are 13 in my house, in various translations, and I have loads in my office. Our church even has a large stash of them for visitors to borrow or we'll give them away to people that need them.
This is in stark contrast to a scene in the movie. Martin Luther brings an early copy of the New Testament written in German for the founder of the university, Frederick the Wise. In that time, the Bible wasn't written in the common vernacular, and people depended on priests to tell them what was in it. The masses had never seen one.
When Luther tells Frederick what it is, Frederick then warns him of the dangers. He warns him about how Rome will react...that the Pope will view it as an act of treason, that they will respond in kind. Luther tells him he can't go against his conscience. Frederick then says, "Okay, just so you know. Can I have my present now?" Even knowing the societal upheaval it would cause, he wanted his own copy.
Frederick takes it with excited, yet trembling hands. Immediately he opens it. That was a bit over 500 years ago. Over 2,000 years of church history, and we've only had it in our hands for 25% of that!
Sometimes we lose sight of that reality. We have Bibles that gather dust on our shelves. We ho-hum opening them...we unzip the Bible cover that holds our pens and highlighters when the sermon starts and then zip it all back up when it's over. They stay in the back seats of our cars.
It's a special book. With special results for the reader.
One that people literally died so we could...
...have it in our own language. ...have our very own copy. ...have the ability to read it for ourselves and make our own interpretations. ...personally know the God of the universe.
So, for today, I'd like for us all to examine our attitudes toward the Bible. Do we take it for granted as teenagers in America in 2005? Do we view it as God's Word or as a book of rules? What practical steps can we take to appreciate it more than we do? How many Christians throughout history have ever had their own copy of the Bible? What thoughts does this reality cause in your brain?
Brent 11:15 PM
Tonight, we're going to begin looking at how to have personal Bible study. We'll begin by taking an overview of the Bible, so you might want to ask a few questions before you get there:
Why is it called the "Bible?" How many books are in it? How many in the Old Testament? The New? What language was the Old Testament written in primarily? The New? Can you find classifications for the types of books in the Old Testament? The New? Over how long a period of time was the Bible written? How many different authors are there? Who decided what books belong in the Bible? What evidence is there to show that we can rely on the Bible?
And ask yourself one key question:
Why would anyone die for the Bible? People have throughout history...so why would they?
See you at 6:30PM for class!
Brent 4:02 AM
Saturday, March 05, 2005
This will be the last quote on prayer since we had our Oscar night last Sunday instead of regular Sunday School. Again, it's from Oswald Chambers.
"Physical sloth will upset spiritual devotion quicker than anything else. If the devil cannot get at us by enticing to sin, he will get at us by sleeping-sickness spiritually--"No, you cannot possibly get up in the morning to pray, you are working hard all day and you cannot give that time to prayer. God does not expect it of you." Jesus says God does expect it of us. Penance means doing hardship for the body for the sake of developing the spiritual life."--Oswald Chambers
In what ways to we tend to be physically lazy when it comes to the spiritual life? Do you agree or disagree with the idea that we can have a "sleeping-sickness" spiritual life? What are some practical steps you can be taking to develop a deeper spiritual life?
Brent 4:41 AM
Friday, March 04, 2005
Once again, since last Sunday was our Oscar outreach night, we're using the blog space to put some (hopefully) thought provoking quotes up and have you guys interact with them. Here's today's quote:
"Every time we pray, our horizon is altered, our attitude toward things is altered, not sometimes but every time, and the amazing thing is that we don't pray more. Prayer is a complete emancipation, it keeps us on the spiritual plane. When you are at one with another mind there is a telepathic influence all the time, and when born from above the communion is between God and yourself."--Oswald Chambers
Can you think of a time when you attitude toward something changed as a result of prayer? What are some reasons we don't pray more than we currently do? Do you feel like prayer is a "complete emancipation (look it up)" or does it feel more like a drudgery? Why or why not?
Brent 4:35 AM
Thursday, March 03, 2005
Since Oscar night was last Sunday and we didn't have Sunday School, we're reviewing some quotes on prayer. Today we have two quotes from Martin Luther.
"I have held many things in my hands, and I have lost them all; but whatever I have placed in God's hands, that I still possess"--Martin Luther
"All who call on God in true faith, earnestly from the heart, will certainly be heard, and will receive what they have asked and desired, although not in the hour or in the measure, or the very thing which they ask. Yet they will obtain something greater and more glorious than they had dared to ask."--Martin Luther
So, what are you holding in your hands right now that needs to be in God's hands? Does this quote encourage you? In what way? Can you think of anything that you need to call on God in true faith, earnestly from the heart? Does THIS quote encourage you? In what way?
Brent 4:03 AM
Wednesday, March 02, 2005
Again, since we had Oscar night on Sunday and didn't hold a formal class, I'm finding quotes on prayer and hoping you'll respond with various insights...Here's today's quote.
"We have become so accustomed to limit the wonderful love and the large promises of our God, that we cannot read the simplest and clearest statements of our Lord without the qualifying clauses by which we guard and expound them. If there is one thing I think the Church needs to learn, it is that God means prayer to have an answer, and that it hath not entered into the heart of man to conceive what God will do for His child who gives himself to believe that his prayer will be heard. God hears prayer; this is a truth universally admitted, but of which very few understand the meaning, or experience the power." [With Christ In the School of Prayer - Andrew Murray 1828-1917]
So, for today how do we experience the power and meaning of prayer?
Brent 4:04 AM
Tuesday, March 01, 2005
Interacting with quotes on prayer this week, since we had our film festival on Sunday night instead of a teaching time:
"If you try and settle down before God in prayer when you have been dwelling in unrealities, you will recognize instantly the condition of things. As soon as you get down to pray you remember a letter you ought to write, or something else that needs to be done, a thousand and one little impertinences come in and claim your attention. When we suspend our own activities and get down at the foot of the Cross and meditate there, God brings His thoughts to us by the Holy Spirit and interprets them to us."--Oswald Chambers
How does seeing the "world" as "dwelling in unrealities" change your focus on the way you spend your day? How does this quote give you insight into how to overcome the tendency to have your prayers interrupted by your thought patterns?
Brent 4:24 AM
|